Since the release of “The Broken Ladder” Green Paper, I have been very encouraged by the breadth of interest from those on the front line of professional services. However, a report is only the beginning of the conversation and I am keen to discuss and debate these findings directly with those experiencing these shifts first-hand. This will help us all to understand where the specific pain points lie and how we can collectively address them.

The Darwinian AI shift: why adaptability is the new competitive moat

The response to the paper – from amongst others law firms, general counsel, and consultants – strongly suggests a growing recognition that we are dealing with something more profound than a mere tech upgrade. We are witnessing a structural reshaping of the workplace – a shift that is revolutionising efficiency, but simultaneously challenging the traditional career pyramid that has sustained these professions for decades.

The shift to agency: beyond the chatbot

While much of the discussion in 2024 and 2025 focused on co-pilots and generative assistance, we are now entering the era of ‘Agentic AI’. This marks a move from tools that require constant human prompting to autonomous systems capable of executing multi-step workflows. For professional services, this accelerates the unbundling of roles into discrete tasks (something I’ve written about here).

The Jagged Frontier of 2026

It is a mistake to view this transition as a uniform process. Instead, we are navigating a ‘Jagged Frontier’. AI progress is spiky: in some workflows, we have reached near-total autonomy, while in others, the technology remains brittle. This uneven distribution creates a fragmented professional landscape where a firm might be ‘future-ready’ in its research department but entirely ‘analogue’ in its client strategy. Managing this jaggedness is the core challenge of 2026.

The volatility gap and the human transition

In 2026, we find ourselves in a ‘Volatility Gap’. While frontier AI research is moving at an extraordinary pace, the tools that actually clear the hurdles of compliance and risk for internal deployment are often several steps behind the State of the Art. This transition period is where the most significant organisational risks – and opportunities – lie.

My research has highlighted the ‘Junior Cull’ and the risk of cognitive deskilling as routine tasks are automated. If the routine grunt work that once forged professional judgment is being unbundled and automated by agentic systems, we must be proactive in designing new rungs for that ladder.

The recent LPM Frontiers 2026 report confirms this tension: while automation is now the top investment priority for 42% of legal leaders, over 50% admit they are still unsure of their firm’s permitted use cases. We are building the engines, but the governance – and the training of the pilots – is not keeping pace

Strategic adaptation over tool selection

My focus has shifted from tactical ‘tool selection’ to the broader imperative of AI Resilience. It’s about:

• Succession Resilience: Protecting the future pipeline of experts as training tasks are unbundled.
• Epistemic Resilience: Giving leaders the ‘Epistemic Confidence’ to verify autonomous outputs they can no longer manually check.
• Human Premium: Doubling down on the judgment and strategic empathy that AI cannot replicate.

The Darwinian reality

No one can predict the exact arc of the AI story, or when a ‘post-labour’ world might arrive. However, the principle of adaptation remains constant. In a Darwinian sense, the most successful organisations will not necessarily be the most technologically advanced, but those most able and willing to realign their human capital with the new reality.

It is not too late to begin this deeper thinking, but it is certainly no longer too early.

—

I must add that I don’t have all the answers, but I am committed to finding them alongside you. I invite those currently navigating these pressures – Managing Partners, HR leads, and fee-earners alike – to get in touch. Let’s debate these findings and explore how we can reconstruct the learning paths and professional structures that this technology is challenging. Understanding your front-line perspective is essential to building a bridge that actually holds weight.