Law

Hand-in-hand with Policy and (Geo)Politics, the legal ramifications of AI technology are having to be understood and enshrined in law as swiftly as possible. It inevitably is a game of ‘catch up’ given the breakneck speed of technological development and the very significant implications on all areas of society, but consensus seems to be appearing both nationally and internationally.

This section, like others, is a high-level overview of some of the current areas of focus and the frameworks that are being put into place. It should go without saying that this section is not a source of legal advice but instead serves only to highlight some of the areas where AI and the law intersect.

Read more below. Relevant links in the footnotes (‘References’), although NB some are behind paywalls.

International Legal Frameworks

Global Governance Structures

Framework Development: The rapid evolution of AI technology is driving the creation of new international legal structures that must balance innovation with risk mitigation, drawing lessons from existing international bodies like the IAEA and Geneva Convention while addressing AI’s unique pervasive challenges ¹
Standards Implementation: International standards are emerging as crucial tools for AI governance:
- Technical Standards: The BSI AI management system (BS ISO/IEC 42001) provides operational guidelines for responsible AI development and deployment, becoming increasingly important as more countries adopt standardised approaches ²
- Geopolitical Challenges: The rise of AI nationalism and potential “tech cold wars” complicates international cooperation, requiring careful diplomatic navigation while protecting intellectual property and critical AI assets ³

Enforcement Mechanisms

Regulatory Oversight

Existing Legal Frameworks: AI-related disputes are primarily handled within existing frameworks (intellectual property, commercial law, administrative law), with courts increasingly relying on expert witnesses and specialised judges with AI knowledge ⁴
Emerging Institutional Structures: Governments are actively developing new institutional structures for AI oversight:
- Regulatory Bodies: Existing bodies like the UK’s ICO are expanding their remit to cover AI systems within their respective domains ⁵
- Centralised Functions: Some countries are establishing central functions to support regulators in understanding AI risks and conducting assessments ⁶
- International Collaboration: Cross-border cooperation is increasing through bodies like the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) and OECD’s AI Policy Observatory ⁷)

Compliance Frameworks

Implementation Guidelines: Practical frameworks for legal compliance are developing:
- Audit Requirements: Organisations must meet new standards for AI system auditing to ensure accountability while promoting responsible innovation ⁸
- Documentation Standards: Legal requirements for AI system documentation are becoming more stringent to support both compliance and innovation ⁹

Liability and Accountability

Legal Responsibility

Attribution Challenges: The increasing autonomy of AI systems raises complex questions about legal liability:
- Chain of Responsibility: Determining accountability when AI systems cause harm involves multiple parties – developers, deployers, users, and oversight bodies – requiring new frameworks for appropriately assigning responsibility across the AI lifecycle ¹⁰
- Insurance Implications: The insurance industry is developing new models to address AI-related risks, shaping how businesses approach AI deployment and risk management ¹¹

Professional Liability

Practitioner Responsibility: The use of AI in professional services raises new liability questions:
- Medical Practice: Healthcare providers using AI for diagnosis and treatment face new liability considerations, requiring balance between AI assistance benefits and professional judgment responsibility ¹²
- Legal Practice: Lawyers using AI tools must navigate new professional responsibility requirements, ensuring accuracy and maintaining ethical standards while leveraging AI capabilities ¹³

Intellectual Property Rights

Copyright Protection

Creative Works: AI’s ability to generate and modify content raises fundamental copyright questions:
- Artist Rights: Creative professionals seek new legal protections as AI systems increasingly use existing works for training, including concerns about fair compensation and attribution ¹⁴
- Training Data Rights: The legal status of data used for AI training is becoming increasingly contentious, with recent cases establishing precedents for how training data should be handled under copyright law ¹⁵

Proprietary Technology

Model Protection: Safeguarding AI innovations requires new legal approaches:
- Weight Protection: The protection of model weights and architecture represents a new frontier in intellectual property law, developing new mechanisms for securing valuable assets while promoting innovation ¹⁶
- Trade Secret Application: Traditional trade secret law is being adapted to protect AI innovations, balancing intellectual property protection with transparency and accountability needs ¹⁷

Data Protection and Privacy

Privacy Framework Evolution

Regulatory Adaptation: Existing privacy laws are being updated to address AI-specific challenges:
- GDPR Enhancement: The European privacy framework is evolving specifically to address AI capabilities and risks, including new provisions for automated decision-making and profiling beyond traditional data protection concerns ¹⁸
- International Alignment: Different jurisdictional approaches to AI privacy create challenges for global operations, leading companies to navigate complex compliance requirements across multiple regulatory regimes ¹⁹

Individual Rights

Data Subject Protections: New rights are emerging specific to AI contexts:
- Algorithmic Transparency: Individuals are gaining rights to understand how AI systems use their data and make decisions, including the right to meaningful explanations of automated decisions affecting their lives ²⁰
- AI Profiling Controls: Enhanced protections against AI-powered profiling are being developed, giving individuals greater agency over how their personal data is used in AI systems ²¹

Content Authentication

Digital Watermarking

Authentication Technologies: New systems for identifying AI-generated content are emerging:
- C2PA Implementation: The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) is establishing industrial standards for content authentication, becoming increasingly crucial as AI-generated content becomes more sophisticated ²²)
- Platform Integration: Major platforms are implementing content authentication systems:
  - TikTok’s voluntary labelling system provides a model for platform self-regulation
  - Google’s SynthID demonstrates advanced watermarking capabilities that resist modification ²³
  - Industry-wide initiatives are creating shared standards for content authentication

Verification Systems

Legal Requirements: New laws are mandating content verification:
- Electoral Integrity: Special provisions for political content and campaign materials are being developed to preserve democratic processes in the age of AI-generated content ²⁴
- Commercial Disclosure: Legislation is gradually catching up with technology, with the British Government working on frameworks for AI regulation as part of its Artificial Intelligence (Regulation) Bill, expected to become law in 2025 ²⁵

Recent Developments

Global AI Governance and Regulatory Landscape

EU AI Act Implementation: The EU’s landmark AI regulation is being rolled out in phases, setting a global benchmark. From 2 February 2025, prohibitions on high-risk AI practices have been enforced, with provisions for general-purpose AI models and governance structures applying from 2 August 2025 ²⁶
UK’s Sector-Specific Approach: The UK is diverging from the EU’s centralised model, opting for sector-specific regulation with bodies like the FCA, PRA, CMA, and ICO tasked with balancing AI innovation and compliance enforcement ²⁷

Compliance Frameworks and Liability

AI Compliance Challenges: Experts predict escalating AI compliance and security challenges by 2025 as new frameworks emerge, with businesses facing difficulties adapting to evolving regulations and implementing new processes for system audits and AI monitoring ²⁸
Liability and Risk Management: The legal landscape for AI liability is evolving, with companies advised to establish robust internal governance policies and focus on transparency and accountability in AI decision-making to mitigate legal risks ²⁹

Data Protection and Privacy Developments

GDPR and AI: The intersection of AI and data protection regulations is becoming more complex, with key principles including data minimisation, purpose limitation, security, and transparency. Organisations must conduct Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for high-risk AI processing ³⁰
Global Privacy Trends: AI is shaping privacy regulations worldwide, with countries like Canada, Australia, Brazil, and Singapore adopting risk-based AI regulations similar to the European Union’s approach ³¹

Intellectual Property Rights in AI

AI-Generated Content: The legal status of AI-created works is evolving, with ongoing debates about copyright protection and ownership attribution. Companies are advised to stay informed about potential copyright infringement risks when using AI-generated materials ³²
Patent Considerations: The patentability of AI innovations is becoming a key focus, with legal frameworks being developed to address unique challenges including inventorship and novelty. In mid-2025, the UK Supreme Court will hear an appeal on the Emotional Perception patent case addressing AI invention patentability ³³

References: